From Our Bureau
NEW DELHI: A 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court led by CJI DY Chandrachud on Tuesday referred petitions challenging validity of the sedition law under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to a 5-judge Constitution bench, saying it will consider if the issue need to be referred to a 7-judge bench.
This was so since a five-judge Bench had in Kedar Nath Singh versus State of Bihar (1962) already upheld the validity of Section 124-A on sedition. The Bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, declined the Centre’s request to defer the reference since Parliament is already in the process of re-enacting the provisions of the penal code.
The apex court had on May 1 deferred the hearing on these pleas after the Centre had said it was at an advanced stage of consultation on re-examining the penal provision.
On August 11, in a landmark move to overhaul colonial-era criminal laws, the Centre had introduced in the Lok Sabha three bills to replace the IPC, CrPC and the Indian Evidence Act, proposing among other things the repeal of sedition law and introducing a new provision with a wider definition of the offence.
On May 11 last year, the top court had put on hold the penal law on sedition till an “appropriate” government forum re-examined it and directed the Centre and states to not register any fresh FIR invoking the provision.
Besides the lodging of FIRs, ongoing probes, pending trials and all proceedings under the sedition law across the country will also be in abeyance, the top court had said.
The law on sedition, which provides for a maximum jail term of life under section 124A of the IPC for creating “disaffection towards the government”, was brought into the penal code in 1890, a full 57 years before Independence and almost 30 years after the IPC came into being.
###
